Voluntary wording such as “may contain” used to warn about possible unintended allergen cross-contact.
Precautionary wording such as “may contain” should not be used as a shortcut for poor allergen controls. If used too broadly, it can confuse customers; if not used where there is a real risk, it can leave vulnerable customers exposed to cross-contact.
It should be used only where there is a real risk of allergen cross-contact that cannot be controlled sufficiently, and the business should still provide accurate mandatory allergen information.
No. “May contain” wording does not replace the legal requirement to declare allergens that are intentionally used as ingredients. It is only about possible unintended presence.
It is voluntary wording used to warn customers that an allergen may be present because of possible cross-contact, even though it is not intentionally used as an ingredient.